I converted to an Arca-Swiss style ballhead and quick-release system over 10 years ago. As most of you know, this style is a dovetail design and relies on friction to hold a plate in a channel. When I first started reading about them and took a look, I admit I was nervous about the plates sliding out of the sides. Once I tried one, I was hooked on them and lost my concerns. Given a properly-sized plate, they clamp down tightly and are completely secure.
Here are my thoughts on the few clamps I have tried.
First is the length of the knob. If you use the clamp with the knob pointing back at you, it can poke you in the face. To be fair, this is common to most screw-knob clamps. It is apparently a deliberate design decision; I have been told they are long to accommodate more plate styles, but I don't use anything that requires it. To avoid being poked, I think most people use the knob on the other side, sticking out under the lens. My old film body was short and the lens was always too close to the knob for comfort, so I solved the problem by using a square plate on the camera body and oriented the knob to the left side. That worked for me for years until a friend convinced me of the benefits of an L-bracket. Being poked in the face isn't a problem with larger DSLRs!
Kirk (new style) fast screw-knob:
The image is from Kirk's website.Acratech screw knob clamp:
The image is from Acratech's site
Markins lever clamp:
I also don't see the point of a level that is hidden under your mounted camera. To use it, you have to level the clamp before you mount the camera.
Really Right Stuff lever clamp:
The lever wraps around the edge of the clamp and always ends up under your camera or lens, giving it more protection from an accidental tug (which requires a fair amount of force anyway). The safety mechanism is the same as the new Kirk clamp; channels which require screws on the plates to stop an accidental slide. The build quality is excellent; it feels beefy and secure in use. While I would like an extra lock on the lever for my own peace of mind, I don't think it really needs one. In actual use, I never give it any thought; I just know it is secure.
It has a scale on both sides of the clamp with marks every 1mm. However, my L-bracket is fat enough that it covers most of the marks. I can see the larger marks, just not every 1mm.
General observations:
A brand I would like to try, but have never had a chance, is Hejnar. I like the short knob versions.
Another clamp design that looks interesting, but does not fit my Z1, is FLM's SRB-60 screw knob clamp.
In screw knob clamps, I found a trade-off between speed and my sense of security. I'd rather feel secure.
One of the benefits of the lever clamps (this applies to both Markins and RRS, and a few other brands) is that the lever is low-profile, not jutting out above or below the clamp itself. I can orient the RRS clamp in nearly every direction in my ballhead without hitting anything (it barely touches the base when the lever side is down in the drop notch, but this isn't a problem in practice). Screw-knobs can hit the sides, base, or other controls on some heads, making some orientations awkward in use. An L-bracket obviates most of those issues when they occur.
On a monopod, I prefer a slow screw knob like my old Kirk clamp. I think it is easier to tighten in that situation.
On a tripod, since I use an L-bracket, I like the speed of the lever. If I didn't use an L-bracket, I would not care either way.
What works for you is a matter of preference.
No comments:
Post a Comment